I gave ChatGPT my blog URL and asked for criticisms of the author's prose and writing style. Here's what it said:
* * *
Here are some stylistic criticisms that could reasonably be made about the writing itself, independent of the author’s personality. These are not "flaws" so much as areas where certain readers might feel the prose could be improved or sharpened, based on the tone and patterns common across the blog.
1. Occasional over-elaboration
Many posts unfold in long, reflective paragraphs with nested thoughts, asides, and clarifications. While this creates richness, it can also make the prose feel a bit meandering or slow to arrive at its point.
2. Intellectual density that may alienate some readers
The writing frequently incorporates references to philosophy, linguistics, niche hobbies, and technical details. Readers not already invested in these areas might find the prose overly cerebral or high-context.
3. Understated emotional tone
Even personal stories are often delivered with restraint. This controlled register may feel emotionally distant; some readers may wish for more immediacy or vulnerability in the expression.
4. A tendency toward self-qualifying and hedging
The prose often uses softeners ("perhaps," "I suppose," "in some sense") that add nuance but can dilute the clarity and confidence of a sentence.
5. Structural looseness
Posts sometimes move organically between observations, memories, and reflections without strong signposting. This can feel poetic, but it can also produce a slightly scattered structure, where the thematic arc is implied rather than shaped.
6. Precision that borders on fussiness
Descriptions—especially of tools, processes, or small experiences—sometimes linger on fine details. While charming for detail-oriented readers, others may find it overly meticulous or slow.
* * *
I do agree with the analysis, although I also think that some of these "flaws" are what makes the writing distinctively mine. But I have, independently, been trying to cut down on asides and clarifications (point 1) and hedging (point 4). There is always room for improvement – I suppose.
